My Photo

Tidbits & Insights

  • Book of Mormon YouTube Videos
    Here are the Book of Mormon videos I have been producing for You Tube. Enjoy. http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=TheBackyardProfessor
  • Lot and his wife in the Bible........
    JAMES (age 4) was listening to a Bible story. His dad read: 'The man named Lot was warned to take his wife and flee out of the city but his wife looked back and was turn ed to salt.' Concerned, James asked: 'What happened to the flea?'
  • We are but dust..........
    The Sermon I think this Mom will never forget.... this particular Sunday sermon... 'Dear Lord,' the minister began, with arms extend ed toward heaven and a rapturous look on his up turned face. 'Without you, we are but dust...' He would have continued but at that moment my very obedient daughter who was listening leaned over to me and asked quite audibly in her shrill little four year old girl voice, 'Mom, what is butt dust?'
  • Kerry Shirts author: Mormon Times links to the Internet School of the Prophets -
    I was just notified that the "Mormon Times" has linked to our Internet School of the Prophets showing we are serious about studying Hebrew and recognizing the great Spiritual heritage of Judaism, our Brothers and Sisters in Israel. This is very nice to be specified as the best blog for today. Here's the link. http://mormontimes.com/ME_blogs.php?todayBlog=1

Interesting websites

Great Books

  • Did God Have a Wife?: William G. Dever

    Did God Have a Wife?: William G. Dever
    Dever, one of the world's most renowned archaeologists has finally asked the BIG question, and his research, archaeology, and scholarship have come up with the most stunning answer. Yes, God was married! His analysis of the folk religion, and how the common folk worshipped was one of the powerful aspects of this book, the stuff that never made it into the Bible, yet is reflected in the archaeology of the people in the countryside. This is archaeology at its level-headed best. A very shocking book, as well as revealing for his amazingly coherent, and provocative challenges, and answers to the nay-sayers of Asherah being God's wife. I highly recommend it. (*****)

  • Giorgio Santillana, Hertha von Dechend: Hamlet's Mill

    Giorgio Santillana, Hertha von Dechend: Hamlet's Mill
    This is not the easiest book to read or understand, but it is by far one of the most influential ones I own for the sheer power of generating ideas and themes to research and write on. It is archeoastronomy detective work like no other text. Scholarly, erudite, difficult, astounding, breath-taking. I also rate this one as one of those books in my all time favorite top 10. I know others have not found their overall thesis convincing, but archeoastronomy is indepted to this book for having a serious start, and it has also come a long way since, especially with John Major Jenkins work on "Maya Cosmogenesis 2012" and "The Galactic Alignment." Archeoastronomy became a hobby of mine directly because of this book. I highly recommend it. It was reprinted for the 3rd time in 1992, and well worth shelling out the dough for it. (*****)

  • Hugh Nibley: The Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri
    This 2nd edition has been enlarged, updated, totally checked footnotes for accuracy of quotes and use of sources, all new pictures and more than what the original edition had, and all footnotes put at the bottom of the page for easier reading. John Gee, the LDS Egyptologist at BYU/FARMS (Now the Neal A. Maxwell Institute) spent 17 years checking the accuracy of every single quote and deserves our accolades and congratulations. So does FARMS for putting back all the materials that were supposed to be originally in here. It has gone from a 270 page text to over 600. It is a magnificent tome, very useful indexes, much nicer to read and understand, and is one of my all time favorite top 10 books. (*****)
  • Jason Lotterhand: The Thursday Night Tarot

    Jason Lotterhand: The Thursday Night Tarot
    In his down to earth style and humor, Lotterhand opens up the world of the Tarot symbolisms and what they can mean for us in our every day to day lives. Without stuffy erudition, nor with New Age silliness, Lotterhand goes through the Major Arcana of the Tarot Cards and analyzes their interpretations as he understands things. You can't help but come away from this book feeling good. This is the collection of his classes he has taught for years and years, including questions from many of his students and his responses. I have read it many times, and will continue reading it as a perfect introduction as to what the Tarot symbolisms and use really means, not what phony prognosticators of the New Age Movement have hijacked the Tarot to mean. Their use of it is an "adulterated use" to quote Paul Foster Case, another of the true Tarot interpreter geniuses. The overall view of the Tarot following Lotterhand's interpretation is one of love.... love for God, our fellowman, as well as for ourselves. That Tarot has nothing at all in any form to do with Satan worship, devil loving wickdness, and magic is more than proven by Lotterhand's scholarship in this fascinating area. I highly and strongly recommend this cure for the disease of understanding Tarot as an evil Devil inspired system. (*****)

  • John W. Welch, David & JoAnn Seely, editors: Glimpses of Lehi's Jerusalem
    The most complete, insightful look into Jerusalem as she existed in 600 B.C. just before the Babylonian captivity. It analyzes and looks into the social life, economic, political, physical, spiritual, archaeological, and in every way possible to understand what life was like for Lehi as a parent, and Nephi as a child. The updating of the Lachish Letters, of the reform of King Josiah, the Rechabites, International affairs occurring, Egyptian connections, etc., is powerfully transforming our understanding on the very real background and pathbreaking work that the FARMS group (now called the Neal A. Maxwell Institute) is performing on all aspects of the LDS scriptures, culture, doctrine, and history. A most delightful read! (****)
  • Kevin Townley: The Cube of Space
    This book (Archive Press, 1993) is the singular most comprehensive description, discussion, meditation, and writing of the Sefer Yetzirah's description of the Cube of Space in existence. Townley has written a book like no other, although his followup book "Meditations on the Cube of Space" (Archer Books, 2003) is also in-depth and provocative. David Allen Hulse's book "New Dimensions for the Cube of Space," Samuel Weiser, 2000) is a simpler guide, with different developments, discussions and assignments for the Tarot Card symbolisms on the cube however. Townley has discussed every single available notion of the cube, its symbolisms, significance, and interest in both the Jewish Kabbalistic texts, as well as for us in our modern meditations for further understanding of the cosmos. His two books are nothing less than a tour de force, which gives years of pleasant reading. (****)
  • Leonora Leet: The Secret Doctrine of the Kabbalah

    Leonora Leet: The Secret Doctrine of the Kabbalah
    This book just simply stunned me. It is one of the most fascinating analysis of Sacred Geometry and modern Quantum Physics along with a detailed discovery after discover after discovery of the Jewish religious system called Kabbalah. Leet's geometric charts make the book even easier to understand, but the depth of her cogent reasoning concerning the cosmos, geometry, and music is a sight to behold. Her follow up book "The Universal Kabbalah" is quite interesting in the first few chapters and then bogs my mind down with so much detail and analysis that it is far over my head, though I am working on deciphering it. Leet spent over 20 years analyzing and writing about her discoveries. The most significant one concerns the Kabbalah Tree of Life diagram which is remarkably elucidated by Leet, both in the historical aspects of its changes, as well as the reasons why it is the shape and form that it is, and the meaning of sacred geometrical extensions of the already existing lines of the Tree of Life. A most significant contribution, not only to my own understanding of Kabbalah and Geometry, but for my own enthusiasm of learning more about the Kabbalah (****)

  • Margaret Barker: The Great High Priest

    Margaret Barker: The Great High Priest
    With her astonishing range of scholarship and working with ancient archaeological and linguistic data, Barker has changed our understanding of the ancient Hebraic Priesthood as well as religion. This book is a milestone. (*****)

  • Menas Kafatos, Robert Nadeau: The Conscious Universe

    Menas Kafatos, Robert Nadeau: The Conscious Universe
    The Quantum Physics notion of Complementarity (two particles being connected, no matter how far apart they are in the universe), as well as understanding how the part relates to the whole is what is explored in this gem of a little book. This is no spiritual guru linking of science and religion together by mis-representing one or the other or both of the disciplines, but a sober, real look into the ideas of consciousness, and how Quantum Physics has come around to recognizing the universal aspect of consciousness in *all things*. An amazing book, quite technically written, but with amazing conclusions. The main conclusion being that consciousness can no longer be separated from the problem of the way science operates. (****)

  • Robert Eisenman: The New Testament Code

    Robert Eisenman: The New Testament Code
    Again, with his impeccible schoalrship and thirst for detail Eisenman extends his analysis and evidence for a First Century Early Christian provenance for the Dead Sea Scrolls using the internal materials of the scrolls themselves, their literary usages, their dramatis personae, and their descriptions of what sins abound with the wicked foreign leaders, which can only possibly apply to the Herodians. I wish Eisenman's writing style was easier however. For this reason I can't give it a 5 star rating. His information is astonishingly useful however, and rather controversial, my kind of book! (****)

  • Tree of Souls: The Mythology of Judaism: Howard Schwartz

    Tree of Souls: The Mythology of Judaism: Howard Schwartz
    Magnaminous! This compilation from all periods of Jewish mythology, using hundreds, if not thousands of the texts, shows without doubt or question that there was a Jewish mythology, and its power of presentation for relevance is unsurpassed in all of mythology. From the Creation, the the Shekhinah as the wife of God, to Israel's woes, and successes, this detailed, and humorous, insightful, powerful book has so much in it from the lives of the Patriarchs, the prophets, and the rabbis, that it will take many months to read all the way through it. I have referenced it several times, and spent not a few very delightful evenings (even rainy days) browsing through its pages, and the excellent scholarly discussions by Schwarts itself placing things in context. This is a book I turn to again and again and again with new "Aha!" insights from every single page. (*****)

« Creation Ex Nihilo Ideas | Main | Hermes Trismegistus, Hermetic Books of Scripture, and the Restored Gospel »

January 20, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451a1e969e200d83510104369e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ascension on the "Stairway of the Planets": Tarot as a Western Book of the Dead; Emerald Tablet as an Ascension Text:

Comments

chrys333

Brilliant, as usual, Kerry.
Interesting how much the rituals are alike, the soul traveling and having tests and key words.
That is something that isn't ever presented in modern, conventional religion - unless you count Christmas and Easter plays.
Thanks,
chrys333

Oudler

What is Tarot?
Tarot (also known as Tarock, Tarokk, Taroky, Taroc, Tarok, Tarocchi and similar names) is a family of trick taking card games played with an enlarged deck of 78 cards which include an extra court card for each of the four regular suits, a permanent trump suit of 21 cards, and a kind of "wild card" called "the Fool" or "Excuse." Although seen primarily by many as a means of fortune telling or divination, the Tarot deck was created in northern Italy during the 15th century for playing card games. The notion of a trump suit which survives in such popular card games as Spades and Bridge originated with the game of Tarot.

The myth of Egyptian origins of Tarot, while once common, has long been debunked by later scholars. There is also no record of Tarot cards being used for the occult or divination prior to the 18th century. The Tarot card readings popular at Renaissance Fairs are a creative license taken with historical fact and should not be viewed as authentic. Contrary to popular belief, conventional playing cards were not derived from Tarot decks and the Fool is unrelated to the Joker of conventional playing cards. The Joker was created in the USA during the 19th century originally for the card game Euchre.

Kerry Shirts

That's one view of it yes. Paul Foster Case has also demonstrated with great intelligence that the Tarot as a divination tool is incorrect. It is more for personal growth and understanding.

The symbolisms, while being put forward later than many ancient societies, at least in some decks, certainly do tap into an ancient resevoir of knowledge.

Tarot card "readings" used by one as a means of telling soeone else what their future is about, is a misuse in my opinion as well. For a takeoff point of researching into other ancient traditions and ideas however, I find the symbolisms to be very stimulating.

Kerry Shirts

Hi Chryss,

Yes the rituals are fascinating, and in regards to my post, I find the Books of Jeu and the Pistis Sophia to be loaded with fascinating reading. I shall have to put some materials together with these books also. Thanks!

David Littlefield

If you are going to read Pistis Sophia, then you really need to read Bishop Cyril's discouse on the Mysteries! Of course we could just the the 88th section of the Doctine and Covenants, it all ends up at the same place.
- David

Kerry Shirts

True! I need to do some posts on this material as well. I have Cyril's lectures as well as the Pistis Sophia and Books of Jeu.......the diagrams i Jeu are fascinating, even though they aren't the original ones in the actual manuscripts. At least not all of them. I would love to have a copy of the original materials.

Joe Steve Swick III

Oudler said: "The myth of Egyptian origins of Tarot, while once common, has long been debunked by later scholars."

Joe responds: So, the old 'Gypsy Fortuneteller stuff is all myth? I'm heartbroken.

:-))

Oudler said: "There is also no record of Tarot cards being used for the occult or divination prior to the 18th century."

Joe responds: Not if your sole source of Tarot information is Decker and Dummett. While D&D provide important scholarly discussion, the facts are not yet entirely in, and the final score has yet to be tallied regarding the earliest occult uses of Tarot. :-) In the first place, the use of playing cards in divination DOES date back even earlier than the creation of Tarot. In his nicely documented book, _Mystical Origins of the Tarot_ (http://www.amazon.com/Mystical-Origins-Tarot-Ancient-Modern/dp/0892811900/), Paul Huson notes that the earliest references to playing card divination are from the 14th century (i.e., the 1300's). From the 15th century, playing card divination was popular in Germany, where special oracle books were printed for use in conjunction with the deck. Such books were frequenly illustrated "with depictions of Fortune's Wheel, as they are in similar Italian lot-books of the following century" (Huson, 47). As for the specific use of Tarot as a divinatory tool, evidence is relatively strong that "during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries the tarot was already being viewed as an occult device." Further, based upon the 1989 discovery of a pre-1750 Bolognese manuscript which "gives a list of cartomantic interpretations for ... Bolognese tarocchi cards" (ibid.) it seems quite likely that the assertion of Decker and Dummett that there was no occult or divinatory use of Tarot until the 18th century is is incorrect.

Huson has this to say about Dummett's thesis (which appears in two separate books -- _A Wicked Pack of Cards: The Origins of the Occult Tarot_, and _A History of the Occult Tarot: 1870-1970_):

"Michael Dummett, who is opposed to what he regards as the misappropriation of the tarot by occultists, doubts that the images depicted on the trumps taken as a set contained any special meaning to their earliest users, inasmuch as they were standard subjects of medieval and Renaissance iconography. I, on the other hand, for the very same reason, believe the trumps to have been pregnant with meaning from the start, their symbolism drawn from the world of medieval drama, of miracle, mystery and morality plays, with a hint of Neoplatonism evident here and there, which lent itself very readily to esoteric uses" (Huson, xiii).

I largely agree with Huson's very careful scholarship. Whether tarot was used for divination (or was born in ancient Egypt) or not is less interesting to me than its apparent relationship to the mystery plays of the middle ages, as well as to certain streams Renaissance-period religion and philosophy -- including the belief that viewing of fine art could heal or set something right in the soul. While there is no doubt that Tarot was used in common games and in divinatory practices such as "sortilege" or the drawing of lots as early as the 1500's, I'd suggest that they may have had another purpose as well.

Oudler said: "Contrary to popular belief, conventional playing cards were not derived from Tarot decks"

Joe responds: That is correct. Versions of conventional playing cards are traceable to the mid-1300s, and appear to have "evolved from a source ... that ... can be traced to the Persian Empire before the time of the Islamic conquest in 642 C.E" (Huson xiii). The Trumps (or Major Arcana) appear to have been invented in Italy some time in the early-to-mid 1500's, as an expansion of the "regular" deck. It may (or may not) have been named for Petrarch's poem, I trionfi, composed in the late 1300's.

Regarding the derivation of the Tarot Trumps, Huson explains: "Judging from the facts that no decks consisting solely of twenty-two trumps have survived and that the early uncut printed sheets of tarot cards and various Visconti and D'Este painted decks all show trumps and suit cards united, it seems ... likely that somebody had the bright idea of making the regular game of fifty-six Mamluk-derived playing cards more complex by adding to it twenty-one special, high-ranking cards (and one special nonranking card)" (Huson 29).

Oudler then said: "The Tarot card readings popular at Renaissance Fairs are a creative license taken with historical fact and should not be viewed as authentic."

Joe responds: Your comment can be taken in two ways, and so I'll address both. In the first place, the Renaissance roughly covers the period from the 14th ~ the 16th centuries. So, the Tarot cards themselves were certainly a product of the Renaissance. Huson argues that by the late 1500's to early 1600's, the Tarot was already being viewed as an occult device. And, we are fairly certain that there were Tarot readings by the late 1600's ~ early 1700's. This is a little late for Tarot-mancy during the Renaissance, but there is little doubt that cartomancy itself existed in the 1500s: in fact, Huson's example was a German oracle-book "entitled _Ein Loszbuch ausz der Karten gemacht_, (A Lot-Book Made from Playing Cards), which was written in the 1480s to accompany a deck of cards using the German suit signs Hawkbells, Hearts, Leaves, and Acorns.... Such lot-books seem to have been highly popular among educated Germans of the fifteenth century" (Huson, 46-7). So, while the historical authenticity of a Renaissance use of Tarot for cartomancy is not certain, it is not entirely impossible or unlikely, either. Here is a piece of evidence that has bearing on Kerry's premise that Tarot was a Renaissance "Ladder of Ascent":

"There are ... those tarotlike engravings ... dated to about 1470 now and once attributed to Andrea Mantegna. They are printed on flimsy paper and seem much too large from playing ordinary card games.... The ukknown Ferrarese artist who created them made FIFTY IMAGES (rather than twenty-two or seventy-eight), five ranks of ten, and they too carry alphabetical letters as well as numbers. The first rank depicts the social order of precendence in medieval and early Renaissance times, PROGRESSING from a BEGGAR to an ARTISAN to a SERVANT, PASSING THROUGH KING and EMPEROR, ENDING WITH THE POPE. The second rank shows the Arts as the nine classical muses led by the god Apollo; the third rank depicts the SEVEN LIBERAL ARTS OF MEDIEVAL SCHOLASTICISM, PLUS ASTROLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, AND THEOLOGY; the fourth rank depicts the three disciplines of ASTRONOMY, CHRONOLOGY, and COSMOLOGY, followed by the SEVEN VIRTUES. The fifth and most sublime rank shows the SEVEN PLANETARY GODS, then the SPHERE OF THE FIXED STARS, FOLLOWED BY THE PRIMUM MOBILE, OR ETHER, AND FINALLY THE PRIMA CAUSA, or FIRST CAUSE of EVERYTHING. In other words, the Mantegna tarocchi presents THE ENTIRE COSMIC LADDER in typical Neoplatonic fashion, FROM BEGGAR to GOD, IN FIFTY STEPS that would be comprehensible to the educated fifteenth-century mind.... we can detect similarities to the tarot trupmps. Undoubtedly THE ARTIST WAS DRAWING INSPIRATION HER FROM EXISTING TAROCCHI.... Differing opinions have been advanced as to ... [the] purpose [for which these cards were created]. Playing-card historian Detlef Hoffmann has conceded that they were MOST LIKELY USED TO PROVIDE A STIMULUS FOR PROFOUND DISCUSSION BETWEEN EDUCATED PEOPLE RATHER THAN TO PLAY IDLE GAMES" (Huson, 48-9).

I trust you find this remark as stimulating as I do. I certainly is food for thought, and it perhaps provides some nice support for Kerry's article (which is a nice expression of an opinion he and I apparently share).

For those of you interested in the celestial ascent as depicted in Masonic ritual, I'd again point out this early use of the Seven Liberal Arts and Sciences as part of the Ladder extending from Earth to Heaven.

Sorry for the small digression. Of course, the other issue your ambiguous language raises is that of the authenticity of the Tarot reading itself. Whether the *reading itself* is "authentic" or not has nothing whatsoever to do with the historical origins of Tarot, I think you'll agree! Now, I frankly see little value in Tarot fortunetelling; I do see an immense value in Tarot as a psychological and even instructional tool, and I speculate that something akin to this may have been appreciated as a value of the Tarot Trumps relatively early on.

Kindest,
Joe Swick

Oudler

Yes, I have drawn on Dummett on his works on Tarot games, as Tarot in it's purest form is card playing. I have not read Huson's work. I have downloaded a pdf file reviewing Huson's book and if I understand it Huson is not contradicting Dummett as he is focusing on the Tarot symbolism which was beyond Dummett's focus. Are you sure you are not taking Huson's work out of context?

Joe Steve Swick III

Oudler says: "Yes, I have drawn on Dummett on his works on Tarot games, as Tarot in it's purest form is card playing."

Joe responds: Well, that is what Dummet says, and I can appreciate why you would be attracted to such a view. However, it is a view contradicted by Huson's unique and nicely supported thesis.

Oudler then says: I have not read Huson's work. I have downloaded a pdf file reviewing Huson's book and if I understand it Huson is not contradicting Dummett as he is focusing on the Tarot symbolism which was beyond Dummett's focus.

Joe replies: Huson definitely focuses on Tarot symbolism. However, this does not mean he does not contradict Dummett. He clearly does, as the quotes from him in my previous post demonstrate. That is to say, Huson uses evidence for his argument which was not even considered by Decker and Dummett.

As you nicely summarize, it is Dummett's contention that "there is also no record of Tarot cards being used for the occult or divination prior to the 18th century." By contrast, "Paul Huson notes that the earliest references to playing card divination are from the 14th century (i.e., the 1300's). From the 15th century, playing card divination was popular in Germany, where special oracle books were printed for use in conjunction with the deck. Such books were frequenly illustrated 'with depictions of Fortune's Wheel, as they are in similar Italian lot-books of the following century' (Huson, 47). As for the specific use of Tarot as a divinatory tool, evidence is relatively strong that 'during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries the tarot was already being viewed as an 'occult device.' Further, based upon the 1989 discovery of a pre-1750 Bolognese manuscript which 'gives a list of cartomantic interpretations for ... Bolognese tarocchi cards' (ibid.) it seems quite likely that the assertion of Decker and Dummett that there was no occult or divinatory use of Tarot until the 18th century is incorrect."

Oudler then asks: Are you sure you are not taking Huson's work out of context?

Joe replies: I leave it to you to actually read Huson and form your own opinions. However, it would be polite to have actually read him before suggesting I've taken him out of context, I think.

:-)

I don't know what in my posting would even suggest that I'd misrepresented his argument, frankly. If anything, I've understated Huson's point, which is that the use of playing cards for divination can be documented even earlier than the first Tarot decks, and that Tarot decks themselves appear to be a kind of "Game of Man," as suggested by the circa-1470 Mantegna work. This work, notes Huson, was "drawing inspiration from existing Tarocchi," and was "likely used to provide a stimulus for profound discussion between educated people rather than to play idle games."

As I said.

:-)

Cheers,
Joe Swick

Joe Steve Swick III

Joe said: "The Trumps (or Major Arcana) appear to have been invented in Italy some time in the early-to-mid 1500's, as an expansion of the "regular" deck. It may (or may not) have been named for Petrarch's poem, I trionfi, composed in the late 1300's."

I meant early-to-mid 1400's as the date for the creation of Tarot. My apologies. I was thinking XV Century.

~J

Oudler

History of Occult Tarot is slightly dated because of the recent discovery of Bolgnese Taromancy. History of Games Played with the Tarot Pack does mention it however. Dummet did write something on it. The Playing Card vol. 32 no. 2 (2003) pp. 79-88
http://www.tarotpedia.com/wiki/index.php/Bolognese_Tarot_Divination

Oudler

I would be interested in Huson's work as I am also curious as to how he would evaluate the work of A.E. Waite. Huson recently created, as of this writing unpublished, deck using more direct English translations of the original French/Italian nomenclature. For example, Trump I is called "the Juggler" and not "the Magician" I would like to see this deck published soon.

Howie Schwartz

Astrology is the ancient practice and study of the stars and planets. Its history goes back to Babylonian times. Astrology is not the same as astronomy. Astronomy studies only the science of the planets, stars and universe.

horoscope, astrology

Kerry Shirts

At one time there was no differences between the two disciplines however. Just so ya know!

Best,
Kerry

BK

I saw somewhere that someone said, "trying never got anyone anywhere, you either do it or you don't." Indeed, there are those who will without question when given a notion, do the thing and succeed. For that person there is no doubt, but for those who "do" have doubts, they need to instill in their hearts the modicum of operation, "to keep trying." Some choose to struggle, others simply claim the prize and sail on. However, that ship is destined for disaster, if the captain doesn't share his abundance. Much like the young couple who goes to the Carnival, and the young man is given the task of knocking down the bottles for a stuffed bear. He doesn't do it for himself, but rather to give the prize to his lady. In such a manner, "both" are happy, as the bear means little but the gesture says it all. There is little choice, you either jump in or get left behind, even Socrates drank the poison in the end.

Joe Steve Swick III

As a final comment, I'd point out that while the Tarot itself may not have been an Egyptian "invention," the ancient Egyptians certainly had a believe in a "Ladder of Ascent" -- Horus' ladder to the heavens, and all that. So, too, the Jewish Kabbalists and their Mystical Tree, as well as the early Christians. Desert Father John Klimakos has a Ladder of Ascent, which includes 50 steps. You will recall that Andrea Mantegna's "Game of Man" also included 50 images, progressing from Beggar to the Primum Mobile. Kerry's suspicion that there is a Heavenly Ascent in Tarot is an interesting one -- it is a suspicion I share. After all, Key 1 is The Magician -- Adam in the Fertile Valley-- and Key 9 is The Hermit -- the Ancient of Days on his snow-capped Mountain Peak.

Thanks for some great work, Kerry.

k -mikey

elohim is a plural feminine term. The key being its 32 occurances in the first chapter of genesis. The 32 paths of wisdom and 50 gates of light. Where is personality in air fire earth and water, they make up 40. The other 10 are personality archtypes, imperative for conscious individual comprehension. So have all the so called wise men missed it. Apparantly so.
bliss joy wonder

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment