|
The man with a violin played six Bach pieces for about 45 minutes. During that time approx. 2 thousand people went through the station, most of them on their way to work. After 3 minutes a middle aged man noticed there was a musician playing. He slowed his pace and stopped for a few seconds and then hurried to meet his schedule. 4 minutes later: the violinist received his first dollar: a woman threw the money in the hat and, without stopping, continued to walk. 6 minutes: A young man leaned against the wall to listen to him, then looked at his watch and started to walk again. |
10 minutes:
A 3-year old boy stopped but his mother tugged him along hurriedly. The kid stopped to look at the violinist again, but the mother pushed hard and the child continued to walk, turning his head all the time. This action was repeated by several other children. Every parent, without exception, forced their children to move on quickly.
45 minutes:
The musician played continuously. Only 6 people stopped and listened for a short while. About 20 gave money but continued to walk at their normal pace. The man collected a total of $32.
1 hour:
He finished playing and silence took over. No one noticed. No one applauded, nor was there any recognition.
No one knew this, but the violinist was Joshua Bell, one of the greatest musicians in the world. He played one of the most intricate pieces ever written, with a violin worth $3.5 million dollars. Two days before Joshua Bell sold out a theater in Boston where the seats averaged $100.
This is a true story. Joshua Bell playing incognito in the metro station was organized by the Washington Post as part of a social experiment about perception, taste and people's priorities. The questions raised: in a common place environment at an inappropriate hour, do we perceive beauty? Do we stop to appreciate it? Do we recognize talent in an unexpected context?
One possible conclusion reached from this experiment could be this: If we do not have a moment to stop and listen to one of the best musicians in the world, playing some of the finest music ever written, with one of the most beautiful instruments ever made.... How many other things are we missing?
I have seen the video on YouTube. pretty amazing.
Posted by: Russ | January 22, 2010 at 09:57 AM
This reminds me of Hugh Nibley's description of goods of first and second intent. This performance was obviously a good of first intent and freely given but the worldly ways of our culture are driven to seek goods of third intent (money). I wonder if I would have stopped? I think I would have, I hope I would have.
Posted by: Trevor | January 22, 2010 at 10:16 AM
On a different level, this story is applicable to how the Spirit works in our lives. Most of the time, we set aside specific times to feel the Spirit (i.e., durign Church, scripture study, etc.) However, if we would just take the time to listen throughout the day, we would find that the Spirit constantly plays in our hearts and minds.
Great story, I'd never heard that before.
Posted by: Jeremy | January 22, 2010 at 10:41 AM
I've seen this before and I think it's a bogus premise that was designed to fail... He was in a busy train station during work hours, when people genuinely needed to get somewhere. I'm sure many people would have liked to stop, or thought to themselves, wow, that guy sounds great, but just didn't have the time or good reason to stop. Who the man was and his model of violin and all that is irrelevant, as people often hear great musicians performing and busking in places like that. Put the same guy in a concert hall on a Saturday night, which is his usual venue, and people will actively appreciate him and pay him handsomely for it.
The original article about this made note of the kid who really wanted to stop and listen and the parent dragging them away, but again, that's very misleading... many kids would want to stop even if the guy was playing an out of tune bagpipe version of "Ice Ice Baby".
I'm a full-time musician myself and I can appreciate the "stop and smell the roses" message of this, but I think it was a faulty and manipulative means of trying to show that.
Posted by: Eric Herman | January 23, 2010 at 07:13 PM