Margaret Barker in her Older Testament: The Survival of Themes from the Ancient Royal Cult in Sectarian Judaism and Early Christianity, reprint, Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2005, describes how Enoch as Metatron, and Melchizedek, and the Son of Man, are all functionally similar. (pp. 38f).
In light of this remarkable similarity of works (as I shall call them, i.e., their activities, their functions on earth and in heaven, say for instance, being High Priests...), I find it remarkably interesting that Robert Eisenman has described the Zaddik ideology and associations to dovetail in interesting ways.
In all of his works, Eisenman (who has focused on elucidating the Dead Sea Scrolls for decades now), has shown that not only Habakkuk, but Phineas, Elijah, Hanan the Hidden, Honi the Circle Drawer, and James the Just, the leader of the Jerusalem Judaism of the first century, and the true successor of Jesus, his brother, are all Zaddikim (that is, Just and Righteous), and rainmakers, not to mention leaders if not actual High Priests themselves.
The link with Barker's list (Enoch, Melchizedek, Son of Man, Angel of Yahweh, and perhaps Metatron - who is said to be Enoch only in his heavenly aspect after he has been deified), and Eisenman's list is the High Priest, the actual earthly functioning Zaddik and miracle worker which brings salvation to the people, (through rainmaking and ending of famines following Eisenman), and which High Priest actually represents the Lord on earth (following Barker).
From Eisenman's understanding, this Son of Man coming in the clouds imagery stemming from Daniel is tied in with what he terms "eschatalogical rainmaking imagery", as well as with apocalyptic judgment of the end times. Barker's analysis of the Son of Man is equally as fascinating as it brings in Enoch, Melchizedek, and others from the ancient Judaic tradition.
Though these two Biblical scholars use the same materials in the scrolls, it is utterly fascinating to see the differences in their paradigms, and use of the materials. Combining them together is an exercise in incredible learning and understanding. I shall continue to do so, along with the Zohar as I have time. But this is a head's up, Both Eisenman and Barker are going to be discussed on my blog, in extenso...
Recent Comments